RUBRIC: METHODOLOGY
Description: The chapter contains relevant information about the design of the
study. Therefore, it contains detailed information about the type of context
and setting, the participants, the researchers and the methods used for the data
collection and the ethical considerations
Tense: Write use the present simple
|
|||||||
Criteria
|
Points assigned
|
Points earned
|
Comments
|
||||
Type of Study
|
|||||||
This
section clearly defines the type of research and the methodology.
|
0.5
|
|
.In blue for research projects
|
||||
It cites
relevant authors that show the connection between the current study and the
theory. (citation)
|
0.5
|
|
|
||||
Description of the implementation
|
|||||||
Write
the description of what you intend to implement in your practicum
|
|
|
Grey only for classroom practice
|
||||
Total
|
1.0
|
|
|||||
Reader is
contextualized from wider to more specific information. Therefore, relevant
information about the description of the site (location, type of school,
grades, No. of teachers, No. of students, economical status, resources) is
presented. PEI analysis (if necessary)
|
0.25
|
|
In green for both
ss didn’t follow rubrics
Internet you ffind information
There three schools
No proper names allowed (ethics)
·
Providencia = autonoma
·
La 14 round point = autonoma
·
Poblado= Dirigida
|
||||
Total
|
0.25
|
|
|||||
Setting (of the participants)
|
|||||||
Setting
clearly describes the conditions and related information to the study such as:
No. of English teachers, grades that take English courses, No. of hours per
week students are exposed to the language, Curriculum or standards followed,
and teachers’ academic background to establish the participants’ profile
|
0.25
|
|
|
||||
Total
|
0.25
|
|
|||||
Participants
|
|||||||
The
section states the reason for the number of participants, how and why they
were selected. It uses theory as reference for sampling (citation)
|
0.25
|
|
|
||||
The
section shows the main characteristics of the population involved in the
study such as: teachers’ or learners academic level, origin, gender, age,
disciplinary or personal profile, or any other particular data.
|
0.25
|
|
|
||||
Total
|
0.5
|
|
|||||
Researcher’s Role
|
|||||||
It cites
relevant authors that show the connection between the theory of the
researchers’ role and the current study. (citation)
|
0.25
|
|
|
||||
Roles of
each researcher/ teacher are specified according to their tasks in the
research study. (citation)
|
0.25
|
|
|
||||
Total
|
0.5
|
|
|||||
Data analysis and collection (instruments)
|
|||||||
The
section presents at least different three (3) methods that provide a variety
of data to develop the triangulation. Instruments’ definition (authors) to support their view about the
relationship between author and expected data. ( in the appendix)
|
0.25
|
|
|
||||
The section clearly shows the theory according
to which the collected data will be analyzed. It may be either grounded
theory- priory theory
|
|
|
|
||||
Total
|
1.0
|
|
|||||
Instructional Design (if necessary)
|
|||||||
The section provides an introductory and a
conclusive paragraph. It has the number of sections carried out, what was
done in each one and how it was done. (one paragraph per class delivered).
This section mentions all a brief description of all
the lesson plans implemented the objective of each class (a paragraph per
class).
|
0.25
|
|
|
||||
It cites well known authors who are authorities in
the field of teaching and learning whose theory is highly connected to the
theme or aspect being implemented in the lesson plans
|
|
|
|
||||
The researcher must present all lesson plans designed
that include the material used ( in the appendix)
|
|
|
|
||||
Total
|
0.5
|
|
|||||
No comments:
Post a Comment